dadams
Jan 9 2006, 05:43 PM
QUOTE(Daren C @ Jan 9 2006, 11:38 AM)
QUOTE(wilko51 @ Jan 9 2006, 04:19 PM)
Daren, I have been using 117-120 but I
have now dropped to 110-112. I just seem to be smoother at that drag
factor. I am yet to try a 2K to get a reference time at this drag factor
as I'm locked in a meters challenge
at the
moment and just don't have the speed in my legs.
Lucky for you I took yesterday
off, then, innit? =) I've only done 10k today so far, too, but will get in at
least another 7k later.
I started at 110df on my return to erging in
July, but soon increased it to 120. I think I'll experiment a bit in the 105-140
range.
Daren,
If
you're looking for a df for this months challenge, then I would highly recommend
as low as possible (in fact I would recommend that to everyone). With the rate
as low as it is, you'll want to keep the fly wheel spinning as fast as you can,
for as long as you can.
If you're looking for a df in general, then I'd
recommend you go with your experiment.
Daren C
Jan 9 2006, 05:47 PM
QUOTE(dadams @ Jan 9 2006, 04:43 PM)
If you're looking for a df for this
months challenge, then I would highly recommend as low as possible (in fact I
would recommend that to everyone). With the rate as low as it is, you'll want to
keep the fly wheel spinning as fast as you can, for as long as you can.
I'm going to investigate drags
in general, I think, but I hadn't even considered the merits of a specific drag
for this particular challenge. That's a good point, and I'll do my next attempt
with a lower drag to see if it makes much difference.
Citroen
Jan 9 2006, 08:31 PM
QUOTE(Daren C @ Jan 9 2006, 03:52 PM)
As I will be lightweight soon (no,
really, I will!) I'm interested to hear what drag factor other TA lightweights
use. I
think Citroen uses arund 110, is that correct? What
about you, Niall?
At the moment, I'm using 120.
For the last
couple of weeks I've been using 120. It seems to suit the 3K and 805m distances.
I'll, probably, drop it back to 110 (or less) for my next 30'R20.
dadams
Jan 9 2006, 08:40 PM
MAD II is right on our tail for the 3rd spot. Anyone
doing the challenge again soon?
Niall
Jan 9 2006, 09:23 PM
QUOTE(Daren C @ Jan 9 2006, 10:52 AM)
As I will be lightweight soon (no,
really, I will!) I'm interested to hear what drag factor other TA lightweights
use. I
think Citroen uses arund 110, is that correct? What
about you, Niall?
At the moment, I'm using 120.
I'm on 120
currently but considering dropping to 110 for a smoother stroke.
QUOTE(dadams @ Jan 9 2006, 02:40 PM)
MAD II is right on our tail for the 3rd
spot. Anyone doing the challenge again soon?
I'm doing it
again tomorrow morning and this time coach says I can do it without any HR or
pace restrictions (last week's was restricted to 2:02 pace). Hoping for sub-2:00
tomorrow. DF will be 120.
Next week I'll try it again at DF110.
Citroen
Jan 9 2006, 09:23 PM
QUOTE(dadams @ Jan 9 2006, 07:40 PM)
MAD II is right on our tail for the 3rd
spot. Anyone doing the challenge again soon?
It needs to
be one of the heavies. I'm not doing another until next week.
dadams
Jan 9 2006, 09:28 PM
QUOTE(Citroen @ Jan 9 2006, 03:23 PM)
QUOTE(dadams @ Jan 9 2006, 07:40 PM)
MAD II is right on our tail for the 3rd
spot. Anyone doing the challenge again soon?
It needs to
be one of the heavies. I'm not doing another until next week.
Sure...leave
it up to the heavies.
Don't know if I can pull much more than what I did. I
suppose I can have the wife with me again. Her threats seemed to work last time.
wilko51
Jan 9 2006, 11:58 PM
QUOTE(Daren C @ Jan 9 2006, 05:38 PM)
QUOTE(wilko51 @ Jan 9 2006, 04:19 PM)
Daren, I have been using 117-120 but I
have now dropped to 110-112. I just seem to be smoother at that drag
factor. I am yet to try a 2K to get a reference time at this drag factor
as I'm locked in a meters challenge
at the
moment and just don't have the speed in my legs.
Lucky for you I took yesterday
off, then, innit? =) I've only done 10k today so far, too, but will get in at
least another 7k later.
I started at 110df on my return to erging in
July, but soon increased it to 120. I think I'll experiment a bit in the 105-140
range.
I can vouch
for a low df on long distances. You just don't get the shock into the joints
with a faster moving flywheel.......took the day off today and maybe Tuesday as
I'm traveling
. Caught up
loads this w/e after doing two 30k's back to back which was best ever w/e. No
ill effects either which proves in the lower df or I was just going slow
The good
thing is that between us the Taff meters are piling on fast!
Fat Taff
Jan 10 2006, 12:09 AM
Hi, Niall thought it would be a good idea if I sign up so
I thought I'd introduce myself. Born and brought up in Caerphilly but moved over
the bridge years ago and now live near High Wycombe. Get back regularly to visit
the folks and watch the City. Aged 45 and got a model C for christmas with a
view to losing some weight. Slow and crap at rowing at present but looking
forward to chugging out some metres for the cause. Cheers, Paul
dadams
Jan 10 2006, 12:14 AM
QUOTE(Fat Taff @ Jan 9 2006, 06:09 PM)
Hi, Niall thought it would be a good idea
if I sign up so I thought I'd introduce myself. Born and brought up in
Caerphilly but moved over the bridge years ago and now live near High Wycombe.
Get back regularly to visit the folks and watch the City. Aged 45 and got a
model C for christmas with a view to losing some weight. Slow and crap at rowing
at present but looking forward to chugging out some metres for the cause.
Cheers, Paul
F.T.
Welcome
aboard. Glad to have you for the cause.
Speedy
Spectre
Jan 10 2006, 03:06 AM
Taffs: had a second crack at the CTC and I am up to 8112m
I just updated my score and we didnt move from third
any
suggestions on how to squeeze a few more meteres out?
dadams
Jan 10 2006, 03:19 AM
QUOTE(Spectre @ Jan 9 2006, 09:06 PM)
Taffs: had a second crack at the CTC and
I am up to 8112m I just updated my score and we didnt move from third
any suggestions on how to squeeze a few more meteres out?
Go faster?
Just a joke mate. How dead were you at the end of this one? I know the
only way I'm going to get more out, is to have someone screaming at me the whole
time. Maybe try that. Get yourself a cox.
Oh...and don't worry about not
getting into second. Your distance helped push us away from MAD II a bit more.
Good on ya!!
Speedy
Daren C
Jan 10 2006, 10:39 AM
Sadly, I'm never going to make the lead boat, so my
efforts will make no difference. I've aborted two further attempts, so far. My
7326 was a PB for the piece, and on the two subsequent attempts I've set out to
beat the pace (2:02.9), and suffered from fly & die. I think next time I'll
set out more conservatively, and try to negative split it in the last 10
minutes. My 5 minute splits last time
were:
1:59.4
2:02.7
2:04.1
2:04.5
2:04.8
2:02.2 (2:02.9
overall average)
I reckon that if I play it smart I can beat that.
Niall
Jan 10 2006, 05:50 PM
Same here Daren, I lasted 5 minutes this morning as I
went out too hard (1:58) and suffered for it. Splits went down to 2:00 and I
just had no strength so put the handle down. Will have another go tomorrow
morning but set out more conservatively (2:01).
Spectre
Jan 10 2006, 05:57 PM
QUOTE(dadams @ Jan 9 2006, 09:19 PM)
QUOTE(Spectre @ Jan 9 2006, 09:06 PM)
Taffs: had a second crack at the CTC and
I am up to 8112m I just updated my score and we didnt move from third
any suggestions on how to squeeze a few more meteres out?
Go faster?
Just a joke mate. How dead were you at the end of this one? I know the
only way I'm going to get more out, is to have someone screaming at me the whole
time. Maybe try that. Get yourself a cox.
Oh...and don't worry about not
getting into second. Your distance helped push us away from MAD II a bit more.
Good on ya!!
Speedy
Thanks Speedy: I
was quite beat up at the end of this one. quite strange considering my first
attempt seemed so easy. I find it much harder to push to a specific split
knowing what I have pulled before than just getting on the machine and going for
it in ignorance. this was actually my third attempt to beat my previous score. I
aborted twice after it was clear early on my legs were not up to it. I might try
monkeying with the DF I have done all attempts at 143 so far.
Great
suggestion on the cox I will have to find one.
As much as
I love my wife she would be an AWFUL cox. I can just see it now, sitting reading
her Vanity Fair....go! thats right keep it up...what do you think of this
scent...oh my,look at nichole richie's knees she looks like a skeleton...did you
know Paris is getting sued....oh yea keep going!
dadams
Jan 10 2006, 06:36 PM
DavidA
Jan 10 2006, 07:22 PM
QUOTE(Daren C @ Jan 10 2006, 04:39 AM)
My 7326 was a PB for the piece, and on
the two subsequent attempts I've set out to beat the pace (2:02.9), and suffered
from fly & die.
I find going
at such a low pace very hard on my back, so don't do it anymore, but I think
your distance is quite good. It does, however, sound funny to 'fly & die' at
a rating of 20
David
chippy
Jan 10 2006, 11:27 PM
QUOTE(Fat Taff @ Jan 9 2006, 06:09 PM)
Hi, Niall thought it would be a good idea
if I sign up so I thought I'd introduce myself. Born and brought up in
Caerphilly but moved over the bridge years ago and now live near High Wycombe.
Get back regularly to visit the folks and watch the City. Aged 45 and got a
model C for christmas with a view to losing some weight. Slow and crap at rowing
at present but looking forward to chugging out some metres for the cause.
Cheers, Paul
Fat
Taff
Welcome to the team
Chippy
Spectre
Jan 11 2006, 01:58 AM
QUOTE(Niall @ Jan 10 2006, 11:50 AM)
Same here Daren, I lasted 5 minutes this
morning as I went out too hard (1:58) and suffered for it. Splits went down to
2:00 and I just had no strength so put the handle down. Will have another go
tomorrow morning but set out more conservatively (2:01).
This was
exactly the problem I was having after my first attempt. The low rate hides the
fact that you are really pulling quite a heavy weight for 30 mins. It got worse
the second and third time I tried even though I didnt feel that tired. I found
that a full day off was what I really needed.
dadams
Jan 12 2006, 12:28 AM
CTC password isn't working. Would someone please enter
9037 meters for me? Thanks.
Speedy
Citroen
Jan 12 2006, 12:41 AM
QUOTE(dadams @ Jan 11 2006, 11:28 PM)
CTC password isn't working. Would someone
please enter 9037 meters for me? Thanks.
Speedy
Daren will
have to fix that.
seat5
Jan 12 2006, 01:18 AM
QUOTE(dadams @ Jan 11 2006, 11:28 PM)
CTC password isn't working. Would someone
please enter 9037 meters for me? Thanks.
Speedy
Getting up
there Speedy!
I'm going again tonight. It's only my second try at it this
month. I hope I don't have the trouble everyone else is reporting on subsequent
attempts.
Last time was 2:02.3 7354 meters. Trying to hit 7500 this time
so pace has to be 2:00. Oh dear. Don't think I can do that (30 min pb at
unrestricted rate was 7336, last year) Oh maybe I can. 2:01 would be 7438. That
would be 84 more meters and only improve our average about 16 meters. That still
leaves us in 3rd place. In fact even doing it at 2:00 leaves us in
3rd.
I'll start at 2:01 and see if I can speed up at the end.
This
may not be very much fun.
The only thing fun about this is thinking what my
30 min PB will be at an unrestricted rate after doing it at 20 spm all
month.
seat5
Jan 12 2006, 02:55 AM
I did it! Well, almost. And we are still in 3rd. I am not
even sure it made our team average go up--I can't remember what it was on before
but the number looks the same to me.
7475 meters av.
2:00.4
This is a PB by 120 meters and got me 994 Nonathlon
points!
Yeah, that and about $4.50 will get me a cup of coffee,
right?
I used a metrenome set on 60 and drove on every 3rd beat, and used
Rerow on the PM3. It didn't take me long to leave the pace boat behind-it was
off thescreen for most of the row.
It made me think of when I was
pregnant and I'd swim a mile every morning. Some days I was soo sleepy because I
had to do it early and I'm not a morning person, so I would pretend I was asleep
while I swam. So I tried it on this piece and sort of chanted "have a nap" on
every stroke. It really helped to keep totally relaxed except on the drive. For
variety I switched to Lull-A-bye when the minutes changed over. This really
sounds stupid but by the end I was really looking forward to changing from Have
a Nap to Lullaby, like it was some sort of reward for surviving the last
minute...
The guys with the white coats are coming to give me a nice ride
soon....
Krysta Coleman
Jan 12 2006, 04:38 AM
QUOTE(seat5 @ Jan 11 2006, 07:55 PM)
7475 meters av.
2:00.4This is a PB by 120 meters and got me 994 Nonathlon
points!
Awesome
stuff, Carla! You'll probably be over 1000 Nonathalon points when you do it
unrestricted. I can't wait to see your next 2k.
I
had to laugh at your Lull..A..Bye, and Go..To..Sleep mental chants. I do a lot
of stuff like that when erging too. Mostly I count numbers, but sometimes I
spell out words, one letter for every stroke. P....A....I....N..., etc.
-
Krysta
seat5
Jan 12 2006, 04:49 AM
QUOTE
I can't wait to see your next 2k.
smile.gif
It's probably going to be
a long wait!
Don't laugh, but I think spelling out PAIN is a
mistake....use more positive ideas! How about I C A N W I N or something like
that?
Actually I wonder if it will be faster unrestricted or not. Until
the last 40 or so Lull A Byes it really felt ok.
Krysta Coleman
Jan 12 2006, 07:41 AM
QUOTE(seat5 @ Jan 11 2006, 09:49 PM)
Don't laugh, but I think spelling out
PAIN is a mistake....use more positive ideas! How about I C A N W I N or
something like that?
Heh, yeah.
But then,
one might also wonder if "go to sleep" and "lullabye" are the sort of inspiring
phrases that you'd want to hear your cox shouting at you? Well, anything that
can help disconnect your mind from what your muscles are feeling and keep you in
a groove is a good thing, I guess.
QUOTE(seat5 @ Jan 11 2006, 09:49 PM)
Actually I wonder if it will be faster
unrestricted or not. Until the last 40 or so Lull A Byes it really felt
ok.
So does this
mean we are going to see a part III to the 30R20 Seat5 performance? If it didn't
hurt til the last 40, you must have more in the tank!
QUOTE(seat5 @ Jan 11 2006, 09:49 PM)
It's probably going to be a long
wait!
Why the
wait? Doesn't fit into your training plan? I need to re-do mine sometime in the
next month too, but I don't expect to make the kind of vast improvement that you
are likely to see on yours. I'd really like to get under 7:30, though.
-
Krysta
Daren C
Jan 12 2006, 10:31 AM
QUOTE(dadams @ Jan 11 2006, 11:28 PM)
CTC password isn't working. Would someone
please enter 9037 meters for me? Thanks.
Speedy
I've
updated that for you, Speedy. I used the web page and your password, so it is
working OK. Maybe you typed your password incorrectly. I'll PM you with what
it's currently set to.
Daren C
Jan 12 2006, 10:37 AM
QUOTE(seat5 @ Jan 12 2006, 01:55 AM)
7475 meters av.
2:00.4
This is a PB by 120 meters and got me 994 Nonathlon
points!
Really impressive, Carla!
I'll have another go, soon. I really hope I can hold it together, next time.
mumbles
Jan 12 2006, 10:53 AM
Hi guys, my name is Owen Davis. Rowing at mumbles ARC,
won welsh ergo j18hw's this year, want to do a bit more machine work. can i
join?
CAROLE MAC
Jan 12 2006, 11:25 AM
mpukita
Jan 12 2006, 01:55 PM
QUOTE(mumbles @ Jan 12 2006, 05:53 AM)
Hi guys, my name is Owen Davis. Rowing at
mumbles ARC, won welsh ergo j18hw's this year, want to do a bit more machine
work. can i join?
If I can join,
you can join ... send a Personal Message to Citroen and he'll get you set up ...
and then get on that erg and start adding meters ... fast!
dadams
Jan 12 2006, 02:22 PM
QUOTE(seat5 @ Jan 11 2006, 08:55 PM)
I did it! Well, almost. And
we are still in 3rd. I am not even sure it made our team average go up--I
can't remember what it was on before but the number looks the same to me.
7475 meters av.
2:00.4
This is a PB by 120 meters and got me 994 Nonathlon
points!
Yeah, that and about $4.50 will get me a cup of coffee, right?
Outstanding stuff Carla.
Just when you think you can't do it...well then you go and put in a pb.
Speaking of Nonathlon points. When ya gonna do your lower distances????
If my calculations are correct, just doing any old time for the 500, 1k and 2k
would vault you into the top 100. Get to it girl!!! The shorter distances are
the easy ones (yeah right!!!).
Dwayne
Paul B
Jan 12 2006, 02:40 PM
Owen
With a 6.36 at Cardiff for an U18 you are
definately in my friend!!!!!
Do you know about the 30' @ 20spm
competition that's running this month on the UK site?
Cheers
Paul
Daren C
Jan 12 2006, 03:22 PM
QUOTE(mumbles @ Jan 12 2006, 09:53 AM)
Hi guys, my name is Owen Davis. Rowing at
mumbles ARC, won welsh ergo j18hw's this year, want to do a bit more machine
work. can i join?
New members
always welcome, particularly pukka boyos.
Owen, do you log metres in the
online
logbook? If so, update your profile to set Taff Attack as your team. If you
don't, then sign up,
then set Taff Attack as your team. =)
For the
Cross-Team Challenge that Paul has mentioned, see
here for the thread on the UK forum, and
here for the web site.
dadams
Jan 12 2006, 03:45 PM
Daren,
Absolutely love your avatar out on the
UK site. Solid stuff mate!!!
Dwayne
Fat Taff
Jan 12 2006, 04:22 PM
Hi everyone, have only been doing this for a couple of
weeks and my calves feel like a sockful of walnuts. Could anyone recommend a
good post row stretch to me. Have played loads of sports in the past and never
had this prob, suppose it could just be old age! Cheers, Paul
mpukita
Jan 12 2006, 04:36 PM
Good gracious ... this 30'@20SPM challenge is a bear
...
Tried improving my distance by shifting from a DF of 111 to a DF of
77. Managed more distance, but felt like 77 (minimum setting on drag) was way,
way too light.
Will try the average next week (94) and see if I can't
help the slow boat get into the top 20. At DF77, felt like I was running in
sand. At DF111 (my normal traing drag - 4.5 on the Model D indicator), felt like
it was uphill the entire way.
Target would be to beat my current
unrestricted 30' PB ... 7285M.
Daren C
Jan 12 2006, 04:40 PM
QUOTE(dadams @ Jan 12 2006, 02:45 PM)
Daren,
Absolutely love your
avatar out on the UK site. Solid stuff mate!!!
Hehe, it rocks, and no
mistake. I nicked it from a guy on another forum. =) I've got another animated
avatar that I think it quite funny, too, but it's too large to use on the US
forum.
Here it is:
I don't remember
that scene in the film, mind.
Daren C
Jan 12 2006, 04:43 PM
QUOTE(mpukita @ Jan 12 2006, 03:36 PM)
Tried improving my distance by shifting
from a DF of 111 to a DF of 77. Managed more distance, but felt like 77
(minimum setting on drag) was way, way too light.
I think it's quite
interesting, Mark, that you got more distance. I tried using a lower drag (100
instead of 120), and found it was a lot harder for me to achieve the splits I
had been getting at the higher drag, and I didn't get anywhere close to the same
distance. I guess this is a technique problem - maybe I just don't use my legs
enough, or correctly.
dadams
Jan 12 2006, 05:38 PM
QUOTE(Daren C @ Jan 12 2006, 10:43 AM)
QUOTE(mpukita @ Jan 12 2006, 03:36 PM)
Tried improving my distance by shifting
from a DF of 111 to a DF of 77. Managed more distance, but felt like 77
(minimum setting on drag) was way, way too light.
I think it's quite
interesting, Mark, that you got more distance. I tried using a lower drag (100
instead of 120), and found it was a lot harder for me to achieve the splits I
had been getting at the higher drag, and I didn't get anywhere close to the same
distance. I guess this is a technique problem - maybe I just don't use my legs
enough, or correctly.
With the
lower drag, you've got to be quicker come out of the catch. That should fix the
issue.
mpukita
Jan 12 2006, 05:42 PM
QUOTE(Daren C @ Jan 12 2006, 11:43 AM)
QUOTE(mpukita @ Jan 12 2006, 03:36 PM)
Tried improving my distance by shifting
from a DF of 111 to a DF of 77. Managed more distance, but felt like 77
(minimum setting on drag) was way, way too light.
I think it's quite
interesting, Mark, that you got more distance. I tried using a lower drag (100
instead of 120), and found it was a lot harder for me to achieve the splits I
had been getting at the higher drag, and I didn't get anywhere close to the same
distance. I guess this is a technique problem - maybe I just don't use my legs
enough, or correctly.
Darren:
To
be fair, my first attempt was a second workout of the day and only the second
time I had
everdone a restricted rate workout for an all out
time/distance. I might have had more distance than today if I had been fresh.
It does appear (to me) that a lower drag factor is better for the
restricted rate ... at least lower than my normal training ... but I feel that
77 was just too low. No question that this requires quick, strong legs to drive
the pace down.
How Speedy gets over 9,000M is just absolutely
inconceiveable to me ... he's a freak (in the kindest sense) of
nature!
-- Mark
Spectre
Jan 12 2006, 06:32 PM
QUOTE(Paul B @ Jan 12 2006, 08:40 AM)
Owen
With a 6.36 at Cardiff for an
U18 you are definately in my friend!!!!!
Do you know about the 30' @
20spm competition that's running this month on the UK
site?
Cheers
Paul
Owen!
welcome aboard. get on the machine and start cranking!
Spectre
Jan 12 2006, 06:35 PM
Great pull Carla! way to go!
mpukita
Jan 12 2006, 06:44 PM
QUOTE(dadams @ Jan 12 2006, 12:38 PM)
QUOTE(Daren C @ Jan 12 2006, 10:43 AM)
QUOTE(mpukita @ Jan 12 2006, 03:36 PM)
Tried improving my distance by shifting
from a DF of 111 to a DF of 77. Managed more distance, but felt like 77
(minimum setting on drag) was way, way too light.
I think it's quite
interesting, Mark, that you got more distance. I tried using a lower drag (100
instead of 120), and found it was a lot harder for me to achieve the splits I
had been getting at the higher drag, and I didn't get anywhere close to the same
distance. I guess this is a technique problem - maybe I just don't use my legs
enough, or correctly.
With the
lower drag, you've got to be quicker come out of the catch. That should fix the
issue.
I'm with
Speedy ... but watch form ... I noticed a few strokes where the lower back was
giving me some warnings ... the whole hinge at the hips aspect has to be
respected ...
Spectre
Jan 12 2006, 06:50 PM
QUOTE(Fat Taff @ Jan 12 2006, 10:22 AM)
Hi everyone, have only been doing this
for a couple of weeks and my calves feel like a sockful of walnuts. Could anyone
recommend a good post row stretch to me. Have played loads of sports in the past
and never had this prob, suppose it could just be old age! Cheers, Paul
F.T. I
have had trouble with my claves off and on for years, mostly from running. The
typical runners stretch were you look like you are trying to push a wall down
work best for me. One leg in front of the other with the forward knee bent and
rear leg extended. Hold for at least 30 seconds on each side. I find that after
that stretch if you find a step or wall were you can place the heal a few inches
away from the step/wall and the ball of your foot up on the step/wall with a
straight leg seems to help also. The main thing is to hold the stretch for at
least 30 seconds and no bouncing. Do that a couple of times a day and you should
see some improvement. I tore a calf a few years ago and it took a very long time
to heal so be careful!
Citroen
Jan 12 2006, 07:19 PM
QUOTE(mumbles @ Jan 12 2006, 09:53 AM)
Hi guys, my name is Owen Davis. Rowing at
mumbles ARC, won welsh ergo j18hw's this year, want to do a bit more machine
work. can i join?
Owen.
Welcome
to
Taff Attack.
Can you PM me with your e-mail
address and your Online Ranking ID number so I can add you to the January
Virtual Team Challenge?
Fat Taff
Jan 12 2006, 07:47 PM
QUOTE(Spectre @ Jan 12 2006, 05:50 PM)
QUOTE(Fat Taff @ Jan 12 2006, 10:22 AM)
Hi everyone, have only been doing this
for a couple of weeks and my calves feel like a sockful of walnuts. Could anyone
recommend a good post row stretch to me. Have played loads of sports in the past
and never had this prob, suppose it could just be old age! Cheers, Paul
F.T. I
have had trouble with my claves off and on for years, mostly from running. The
typical runners stretch were you look like you are trying to push a wall down
work best for me. One leg in front of the other with the forward knee bent and
rear leg extended. Hold for at least 30 seconds on each side. I find that after
that stretch if you find a step or wall were you can place the heal a few inches
away from the step/wall and the ball of your foot up on the step/wall with a
straight leg seems to help also. The main thing is to hold the stretch for at
least 30 seconds and no bouncing. Do that a couple of times a day and you should
see some improvement. I tore a calf a few years ago and it took a very long time
to heal so be careful!
Thanks
Spectre, tried that a few times and feels better already! Cheers,
Paul
Citroen
Jan 12 2006, 07:54 PM
QUOTE(seat5 @ Jan 12 2006, 01:55 AM)
I did it! Well, almost. And
we are still in 3rd. I am not even sure it made our team average go up--I
can't remember what it was on before but the number looks the same to me.
7475 meters av.
2:00.4
Brilliant.
Well done Carla.
Citroen
Jan 12 2006, 07:56 PM
QUOTE(Krysta Coleman @ Jan 12 2006, 03:38 AM)
I spell out words, one letter for every
stroke. P....A....I....N..., etc.
- Krysta
H...U...R...T
B...O...X...
Paul B
Jan 12 2006, 09:07 PM
Just improved my 30' @ 20spm score to 8332m (1.48.0) from
8266m (1.48.9)
I
took on board some of the comments about reducing drag and dropped mine from 130
to 120 and I have to say it certainly made the stroke feel lighter. Took me 10'
of my 20' warm up to get used to it though - it did seem harder to hit splits to
begin with, but overall the ploy worked well throughout and I would add my
recommendation to giving it a go.
Paced the piece much flatter than last
time, went quicker earlier in the piece and reduced the sprint at the end -
which really worked well for me. I'll post my splits in my diary on the UK site
if anyone is interested.
This didn't feel like a max effort, so I'd hope
to go sub 1.48 before the end of the month.
Just my opinion but I think
this session is as much to do with mental strength as physical and if you can
get your pacing right, I think you can amaze yourself with what you can do - for
example at the outset of the challenge I thought I'd struggle to go sub 1.49 but
now reckon I can go sub 1.48.
Spectre - Over to you now a sub 1.50 would
be good
Owen - You've now had all the welcomes - let's see what the youth
section of Taff Attack can do
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the
full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click
here.